Close

February 25, 2011

HP ProLiant MicroServer Benchmarks

OK, as with my last server I used the nbench CPU benchmark which is pretty long in the tooth now, but as a comparison I ran it again:

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :          764.32  :      19.60  :       6.44
STRING SORT         :             118  :      52.73  :       8.16
BITFIELD            :      1.8813e+08  :      32.27  :       6.74
FP EMULATION        :          186.16  :      89.33  :      20.61
FOURIER             :           11665  :      13.27  :       7.45
ASSIGNMENT          :          14.577  :      55.47  :      14.39
IDEA                :          3321.4  :      50.80  :      15.08
HUFFMAN             :          1184.8  :      32.86  :      10.49
NEURAL NET          :          21.828  :      35.06  :      14.75
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          726.08  :      37.61  :      27.16
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 43.090
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 25.960
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU                 : Dual AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo N36L
Dual-Core Processor 1298MHz
L2 Cache            : 1024 KB
OS                  : Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5
C compiler          : gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)
libc                : libc-2.5.so
MEMORY INDEX        : 9.250
INTEGER INDEX       : 12.038
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 14.398
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

I also re-ran the test on my other server:

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
                    :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT        :          1046.6  :      26.84  :       8.81
STRING SORT         :          100.64  :      44.97  :       6.96
BITFIELD            :      5.0524e+08  :      86.67  :      18.10
FP EMULATION        :           165.2  :      79.27  :      18.29
FOURIER             :           18467  :      21.00  :      11.80
ASSIGNMENT          :          35.808  :     136.26  :      35.34
IDEA                :            3620  :      55.37  :      16.44
HUFFMAN             :          1636.1  :      45.37  :      14.49
NEURAL NET          :          28.048  :      45.06  :      18.95
LU DECOMPOSITION    :          1243.5  :      64.42  :      46.52
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX       : 60.118
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 39.355
Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU                 : 4 CPU GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz 3066MHz
L2 Cache            : 512 KB
OS                  : Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5
C compiler          : gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
libc                : libc-2.5.so
MEMORY INDEX        : 16.452
INTEGER INDEX       : 13.998
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 21.828
Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

As you can see, its about a third slower but it uses about 3 5ths the power of my last server, and is almost silent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.